Hopefully that last sentence made sense.
So, what did you think?
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
tinaw |
The Incredible Hulk |
Lead | |
|
I thought it was a vast improvement on the other one. There were a couple of 'scraps to the fans' elements in there. The first part of the movie was
great cinematic drama, the 2nd part, pure summer blockbuster fare. I think the scene that may have been meant to appear after the end credits got moved to appear before the end credits, but the point of the
scene was to link it directly to the scene at the end of Iron Man.
Hopefully that last sentence made sense. So, what did you think?
~Sayid just...being Sayid. The man is made of badass, what more can I say? -- The Diva
|
|||
GrayZombie |
|||
|
Didn't see it. Waiting till next week, maybe. My niece probably wouldn't have cared what we saw, but I wanted to see Kung Fu Panda more than Hulk. But,
yea, they are linking some of the films together for a reason.
|
|||
RodRocket |
|||
|
Maybe they're going to, ummm.... assemble..... something?
__________________
Please help the victims of the Gulf Coast disaster. They STILL need your support. CLICK HERE: Network For Good |
|||
meqal |
|||
RodRocket wrote: Yep, in July 2011 they will assemble. Expect a few others films in the future to have a tie-in to these two between now and then. With a certain super soldier frozen since WWII to be the last to make a film debute in May 2011. Between now and then a certain Norse God is coming to the screen as well. If politicians wanted to do something about crime they would turn themselves in with an oil company executive. |
|||
TheSpaceToast |
|||
|
Pretty good. It's hard not to compare it to Iron Man. I thought the final battle was a little better than Iron Man's, but frankly
I'm sick of watching a bunch of CGI motion blur struggling around in the dark. Aside from his final battle, Ang Lee shot better action. Norton was
extremely good, though Iron Man did better at fleshing out the secondary cast. What works: Act I in Brazil, Norton, Norton, Norton, Liv Tyler yelling
at a cabbie, Mr. Blue's introduction. What doesn't: The villain's not-quite-all-there character arc, CGI helicopters, little lapses in logic (how
do you stay at a motel, eat for two days, drop $25 on a beater pickup, and take a NYC cab, all on $40 cash?), the loss of focus on characters after Act I,
generic NYC battle/disaster scene construction.
Mostly, I'm just jonzing for Wall-E this summer. |
|||
PrezGAR |
|||
|
Saw it earlier. Thought it was good, but not as good as Iron Man. Definitely an improvement on the first Hulk movie.
Nice "Blink and you'll miss it" ref to Stark in the Opening credits. Distancing itself from the origin in the first movie, and making it a lot more like the TV series. Loved how they worked in Bill Bixby. And the use of "The Lonely Man". (aka Sad walking away music) One change from the comics: Mr Blue was Betty. And a definite set-up for Hulk to fight another major foe if they do a sequel. Crush Therapy - The Solution to Any Capper's Problems |
|||
GrayZombie |
|||
|
Finally saw it. Pretty good. To show you how long it's been that I've read anything Marvel, didn't realize Ty Burrell was Doc Samson. Liked all the
cameos in the film (Stan Lee's, Bixby's, Ferrigno's, Paul Soles, Rickson Gracie and Michael K. Willams). Worth seeing.
|
|||
Sidesk |
|||
|
Call me Joe Slow, but is there more than a chance this will get Capped here some day? Only I finally saw the previous Hulk film (not bad, obviously), and since
seeing that that's at the Dome... er... I guess it will?
While others may think they know us, they're only guessing at the person inside.
|
|||